John McDonald, Associate Professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Delaware (also a nice guy!) was kind enough to respond to my website as well.

He has also rebutted Behe's mousetrap in the past: A reducibly complex mousetrap to which Behe responded: A Mousetrap Defended

Here's what Dr. McDonald had to say about my example:

Thanks for sending me the link to your mousetrap evolution page. I liked it a lot. You've come up with a good analogy for the way a complicated, multi-part device like a mousetrap could evolve by one small step at a time, with each step increasing the fitness.Working out the details, like whether the flap was made of wood or drywall and whether the nook was separated before or after the flap evolved, isn't what you're doing. You're not trying to say what DID happen, you're trying to refute an argument of impossibility.

Behe is saying the mousetrap couldn't have evolved because it's impossible to imagine a step-by-step process, with small steps that individually increase fitness, by which that could happen. You've successfully shown that it IS possible to imagine that. Well done.

---John